Who We Are HAQLA Our Watershed Current Projects Insiders Guide
Full 2006 Proposal

Northern Bayshore Regional Dredged Material Management Plan for Raritan and Sandy Hook Bays in Monmouth County, New Jersey

Project Name

Northern Bayshore Regional Dredged Material Management Plan for Raritan and Sandy Hook Bays in Monmouth County, New Jersey

 

Project Summary

A Dredged Material Management Plan will be developed for the Bayshore Region.  The DMMP will involve the nine communities along the Bayshore to develop a comprehensive plan through citizen involvement and collaboration to properly plan and manage dredged material in their communities.  The Plan will require investigation into the current volume of material associated with maintenance dredging, storage capacity limitations and operational/management issues associated with boating and navigation. The plan will identify environmentally sound alternatives for dredged material use, costs associated with different types of dredging, savings associated with municipal coordination, different methods for beneficial use, and pertinent regulatory requirements.

 

Introduction

 

Information of Interest

Marine activities in six of the seven municipalities located along the Bayshore region of Monmouth County, NJ are dependent upon regular dredging of navigational channels, marina basins and slips. Each municipality or marina deals with the management of dredging and disposal on an individual basis, resulting in costly, onerous, and competitive activities.  Moreover, local officials and marina owners are often confused about dredging requirements, restrictions, and management issues.  At the moment, the waterfront communities and marinas in the Bayshore region do not have a sustainable systematic method to manage dredging activities or a course of action to deal with their dredged material. The project partners will create a Dredged Material Management Plan that establishes an economical process for dredging and beneficial use activities.

 

At the same time, municipalities are currently developing stormwater management plans for their communities as required by the state’s new stormwater management regulations.  The project partners believe that improved stormwater controls will reduce contaminants from reaching waterways and significantly reduce sediment from reaching and accumulating in open waters.  For example, regularly scheduled street and catch basin cleaning will reduce sand and silt from reaching harbors, marinas and navigable channels.  Marina owners often report that the first signs of siltation appear near storm drain culverts that empty into marine basins.  Municipal stormwater measures should reduce the need for dredging and ensure dredged materials are approved for beneficial uses. Clearly, improved stormwater management will not entirely resolve the dredging problem but when properly prioritized and implemented, stormwater management will reduce dredging needs.  Overtime, these actions should improve the quality and reduce the volume of dredged material that needs to be managed by this partnership.

 

Background

Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay do not have naturally deep channels near the shore; therefore, navigation channels and marinas must be periodically dredged to maintain authorized depths for recreational and commercial boating activities.  A majority of municipalities and small marinas now discharge their dredged material inside individual Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) sites. Existing CDF sites are filling to capacity and channels are badly silted, thus necessitating continuous dredging. Also, unplanned erosion of sediments from CDF sites damages nearby wetlands, degrades adjacent shellfish and seagrass beds, and settles back into navigation channels thereby impeding marine activities.

 

Public Accessibility

Under state permitting requirements, all marine facilities, including those located along the Bayshore, must provide public access to state waters. 

Scope of Analysis

Analysis will consist primarily of data collection and compilation to create a logical and economically feasible roadmap for dredging and dredge material management activities along the Bayshore.  Data collection will include dredging needs, stormwater management measures, material use options, cost analysis and regulatory requirements.  The DMMP will outline optimum options for a regional coordinated approach involving Bayshore communities.

 

Environmental Benefits

·        Improve access for boating activities

·        Improve water circulation in harbors and channels to enhance water quality

·        Beneficial use of dredged material rather than stockpiling in CDFs.

·        Reduced need and use of CDFs

·        Foster an involved and educated community in the project area

·        Reduce dependence on raw materials for fill associated with development and other uses.

·        Create system of sustainable management for dredged material

·        Provide for cost and profit sharing among those responsible for material management

·        Allow for reliable maintenance dredging schedules

 

 

Project History

The table below identifies dredging activity along the Bayshore Region from 1999 through 2005.  Since 1999, a total of 1,510,114 cubic yards have been dredged with the largest quantities coming from the Naval Weapons Station Earle. 

 

Municipality

Project Location

Activity

Quantity

Destination

Completed

Middletown

Monmouth County-Ferry

Dredging

9,900

Belford Land.

1/14/1999

Highlands Boro

Captain's Cove Marina

Dredging

350

Bayviewcon

2/17/1999

Atlantic Highlands Harbor

Municipal Marina

Dredging

11,800

Adj. CDF

2/15/2000

Highlands Boro

Eugene Shute

Dredging

332

Onsite

6/27/2000

Highlands Boro

Captain's Cove Marina

Dredging

350

Onsite

3/1/2001

Aberdeen

Wagner's Marina

Dredge

35

Onsite

4/26/2001

Keansburg

NJDEP BCE - Waackaak/Thorns

Dredging

29,100

Upland CDF

12/18/2001

Highlands Boro

USCG Sandy Hook

Dredge/Bkwater

1,900

Beach

5/20/2002

Matawan

Matawan Creek

DredgeScience

180

Matawan Creek

5/29/2002

Middletown

Naval Weapons Station Earle

Dredging

258,400

HARS

8/30/2002

Keyport Boro

Aero Marine Terminal

Dredging

6,000

Bk22 Lt20

9/4/2002

Keyport Boro

Hans Pederson Boat Yard

Dredging

6,000

CDF

9/4/2002

Hazlet

Lentze Marina, Inc.

Dredging

4,000

NJDEP CDF

12/12/2002

Hazlet

Captain's Cove Marina

Dredging

2,540

NJDEP CDF

12/17/2002

Middletown

Leonardo State Marina

Dredging

2,500

Belford Land.

7/3/2003

Keyport Boro

Keyport Marine Basin

Dredging

15,000

Onsite CDF

10/21/2003

Union/Keansburg (1300)

NJDEP-Jetty Reconstruction

Dredging

30,000

Beach

12/23/2003

Middletown

Monmouth County Park System

Dredging

unknown

Onsite Belford Land.

2/24/2004

Atlantic Highlands Harbor

Municipal Marina

Dredging

20,000

Onsite CDF

12/16/2004

Middletown

Comptons Creek

Dredging

42,727

N61

3/14/2005

Middletown

Naval Weapons Station Earle

Pr. Rehab/Dredging

540,000

ENCAP/FDP/HARS

3/31/2005

Middletown

Naval Weapons Station Earle

Dredging

521,000

Virginia Site/HARS

6/17/2005

Atlantic Highlands Harbor

Municipal Marina

Dredging

4,000

Onsite CDF

12/22/2005

Union Beach

Union Beach

Dredging

4,000

Boro Rd Cons.

open

Total (cubic yards)

 

 

1,510,114

 

(1999 - 2005)

 

 

Other General Information

At this time, Bayshore communities are in the process of developing a regional smart-growth strategic plan.  The project is sponsored by the Monmouth County Planning Board and the New Jersey Office of Smart Growth.  The Bayshore Regional Strategic Plan is a collaborative effort involving nine northern Monmouth County municipalities:

Aberdeen, Highlands, Matawan, Atlantic Highlands, Keansburg, Middletown, Hazlet, Keyport, & Union Beach
 

The Monmouth County Bayshore Region is characterized by traditional downtowns, dense residential neighborhoods, rich maritime history, and the natural beauty of the Raritan Bay coastline. Despite its natural beauty and recreational resources, the Region has not experienced the overall economic growth realized by the rest of Monmouth County and has remained largely unchanged.

 

The Region’s key assets are pedestrian-friendly seaside villages, miles of sandy beaches, and proximity to the populated metropolitan areas of New Jersey and New York that offer unique opportunities for revitalization. New strategies are needed to balance the need for growth and economic development but also create more cohesive communities that maintain quality of life and preserve the natural resources of the region.

 

The Bayshore Regional Strategic Plan will help revitalize and/or redevelop cities and towns, promote economic growth, preserve natural features and open space, encourage inter-municipal coordination and cooperation, and preserve and enhance quality of life.

The DMMP will be formulated with the guidance and consensus of an established Regional Collaborative consisting of the County and the region’s nine municipalities as well as other involved stakeholders having an interest in the preservation, growth and redevelopment of the Bayshore. Representatives from State agencies including the NJ Department of Transportation, NJ Department of Environmental Protection and the NJ Office of Smart Growth will be asked to participate in the Collaborative. The open planning process to be undertaken will allow stakeholder participation through regular meetings and strongly encourage public participation.

The proposed collaborative will provide a forum and opportunity for issues related to the DMMP to be discussed and resolved.  Planning and decision-making associated with the DMMP can be incorporated into the larger Bayshore Smart Growth Development process.  Integrating the DMMP into the economic vitality of the region will ensure its successful implementation success.

 

 

Proposal Description & Objectives

 

The goal of the proposed project is to produce a long-term regional dredged material management plan (DMMP) for the Bayshore region of Monmouth County. The plan will cover the entire cycle from reducing sources, to accumulation of bottom sediments, and to the ultimate management of dredged material. The project will be the first comprehensive region-wide look at the issue. Having a long-term dredged material management plan will assist waterfront communities and local marinas in the Bayshore region by improving recreational and commercial boating opportunities, while still protecting and maintaining the value of coastal ecosystems. The DMMP will preserve the environment by providing sustainable dredging solutions, reducing stormwater pollution, promoting best management practices for marina operations, and improving education about dredged material use.

 

The Bayshore DMMP will serve as a model for other areas interested in developing a regional DMMP.  Coastal communities throughout New Jersey are struggling with dredged material management issues.  The high cost associated with limited disposal options prohibits many marinas and communities from dredging.  The beneficial use options contained in the DMMP will demonstrate cost saving options viable for many communities.

 

In brief, $20,000 is being requested to create a regional DMMP.  The proposed project will provide local officials with a comprehensive plan that identifies the highest and best use of material in their communities. Project partners will develop a regional plan that involves inter-town cooperation to:

  • determine the current volume of maintenance dredging,
  • discover storage capacity and operational/management issues,
  • identify environmentally sound options for beneficial uses of dredged material,
  • evaluate potential costs associated with different types of dredging as well as different methods for material management, and
  • summarize pertinent regulatory information (local, state, and federal) related to dredged material management for public, municipal, and marina owner use.

 

Project Goals and Objectives

The project goal is to create a community forum by which user groups and stakeholders can participate in the development of the Dredged Material Management Plan.  This will accomplish the following goals.

 

Goal #1: Determine extent of dredging needs along the Bayshore

  • Objective A: Collect information about Bayshore dredging activities.
  • Objective B: Determine the volume of material from maintenance dredging, material management options, storage capabilities, and operational and management issues.

 

Goal #2: Identify and explore the capabilities and opportunities for dredged material management in the Bayshore region.

  • Objective A: Collect material management information on existing CDFs.
  • Objective B: Compile information about environmentally sound dredging practices, beneficial use options, dredging technology and costs and various management methods.

 

Goal #3: Educate marina managers, municipal officials and the general public on dredged material and management.

  • Objective A: Summarize pertinent regulatory information related to dredged material and management to create a user-friendly reference guide.
  • Objective B: Provide information to appropriate agencies for the development of the updated version of: The Management and Regulation of Dredging Activities and Dredged Material in NJ Waters. 

 

Goal #4: Engage user-groups and the community in developing the Dredged Material Management Plan

  • Objective A: Solicit input from the community using various data gathering tools such as Clean Ocean Action’s dredging needs and beneficial material use needs surveys.
  • Objective B: Hold community meetings to discuss dredging options appropriate for the Bayshore community.

 

Goal #5: Develop a Dredged Material Management Plan for the Monmouth County Bayshore Region.

  • Objective A: Assemble and organize information collected in Goals 1-4 to create a DMMP.
  • Objective B: Present the final DMMP to the region through community meetings, and appropriate agencies.

 Project Plan

 

Development of the Bayshore DMMP will follow a systematic process of data collection and strategy development.  The steps necessary for developing a comprehensive management plan are listed below.  In fact, some of this work has already begun by project partners such as the data collection of historical dredging along the Bayshore.

 

STEP I: SURVEYS & BASELINES

1)      Determine the scope of the maintenance dredging needs in the region by:

a)      Providing a detailed analysis of the volume of current maintenance dredging needs (local, state, and federal),

b)      Quantifying the siltation rate of material to determine dredging needed to meet the substantiated volume based on a ten-year cycle,

c)      Considering plans to reduce the volume of material that needs to be dredged by using naturally deep areas in a harbor (or estuary), and

d)      Controlling sources of sediment in the watershed that fills in harbors and channels (e.g., soil erosion prevention techniques).

2)      Discuss acceptable alternatives for dredged material management that are based on criteria developed by the community, and comply with local, state, and federal laws and regulations.   Identify any regulatory constraints that limit dredged material management options.

3)      Gather existing information about material to be dredged to determine general characteristics so that potential uses or limitations of the material can be identified.

4)      Compile federal, state, and local laws and regulations to be included in a reference guide.

 

STEP II: ACTION PLANS

1)   Identify a list of sites that meet NJDEP site selection criteria for beach replenishment, dewatering, and beneficial use and identify potential sites that support the annual dredging needs as well as watershed and community requirements.

a)   Research and identify environmentally sound alternatives based on differing sediment characteristics and annual dredging needs and provide options for beneficial use of dredged materials. For example:

·        Sandy sediments can be used for remediation, beach replenishment, or erosion control projects without the need for a dewatering facility;

·        For beach replenishment, life expectancy of sand on beach should be considered;

·        Silt/mud can be beneficially used as topsoil, road bed material, landfill cover, or other such uses, but first requires a site for desalinating and dewatering; and

·        Reducing sources of sediments will be necessary to minimize dredging needs.

 

At this stage, a needs assessment, a characterization and differentiation of the types of dredged material (which will accurately determine the annual volume of material that requires further treatment, such as dewatering), and a general list of alternatives will have been achieved.

 

STEP III: METHODS & GUIDELINES

1)      Identify methods of dredging, as well as water and land transportation methods for the dredged material.

a)   Efforts should be made to minimize dewatering needs, such as through particular dredging techniques or dewatering technologies that will minimize the volume of material to be managed.

b)   Require environmental dredging techniques that are less disruptive to the sediments and that minimize re-suspension and release of contaminants in the waterway.

2)      Develop an executive summary document for marina managers, municipal officials, and the general public that provides basic information about dredging operation and maintenance requirements.  Summaries will include key information about construction, operations, and closure requirements for dredged material management facilities.  References will be compiled to identify where additional resources can be found.

 

 

CONTINUOUS REQUIREMENTS

The following requirements should be implemented throughout the planning process.

 

  • Consult environmental justice policies according to the Executive Order on Environmental Justice.
  • Identify funding sources for activities related to a regional dredged material management plan.
  • Create and follow criteria prioritizing dredging needs and establish an orderly process for dredging and material management activities.
  • Treatment options should also be identified for dredged material that is found to be too contaminated for direct land application.
  • Identify sources of pollution in the watershed and require implementation of pollution prevention actions that are quantifiable and accountable. These actions will have specific objectives to measure and monitor for success or failure, and have contingency plans. Link these actions to controlling known sources of toxic hot spots.
  • Comply with federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
  • Incorporate collaborative and broad-based public participation (including, but not limited to, community groups, citizens, marina owners, towns, and elected officials) in the planning process.
  • Incorporate public awareness and education campaigns to inform citizens that dredging is important, and that if properly managed, dredged material is a resource, not a waste.
  • Consistently follow-up on each of the steps within each phase and deal with any other issues that are presented.

Statement of Need

Population and boating interest continue to swell in Monmouth County.  Improving and maintaining existing facilities is necessary to expand boating experiences in the County and statewide.

 

The project is not a duplication of services, as a DMMP does not exist for the Bayshore communities.

 

This project should be selected above all others because boating opportunities could see significant declines in the future.  Marina owners are finding the business less lucrative as dredging options are lost, and limited solutions become more expensive.  In addition, stormwater continues to be a source of sedimentation and pollution. Limited options for dredged material management have become unpractical and cost prohibitive.  The project is absolutely necessary for the Bayshore region in order to maintain community culture, waterfront business interests, and boating opportunities.

 

 

Partnerships/Leveraging Resources

Principal project partners include the Bayshore Regional Watershed Council, the Hazlet Area Quality of Life Alliance, Clean Ocean Action, Mr. John Tiedemann, Associate Dean of the Monmouth University School of Science, Technology and Engineering; and Mr. Steven Taylor, Adjunct Professor in the Monmouth University Department of Political Science Policy Program and an environmental consultant specializing in the development of watershed management plans.

 

The municipalities in the Bayshore region and county agencies fully support the development of a regional DMMP and determine it necessary for the maintenance and enhancement of water recreation activities for which their communities are dependent.  The Monmouth County Park System, the Borough of Atlantic Highlands, Middletown Township, Monmouth County Planning Board, the Borough of Keyport, Aberdeen Environmental and Shade Tree Council, have already provided statements of support for the DMMP.

 

A number of organizations have continually demonstrated support for the DMMP by participating in grant proposal development meetings.  Representatives include the Atlantic Highlands Harbor Commission, Keyport Yacht Club, Pederson’s Marina, NJDEP – Coastal Engineering, Naval Weapons Station Earle, Monmouth County Park System, Monmouth County Planning Board, Atlantic Highlands Environmental Commission, Middletown Environmental Commission, Keyport Council and Commission Members, NJ Marine Sciences Consortium, and the Monmouth County Mosquito Extermination Commission.

 

 





Powered by Zumu Software
Websites at the speed of life.
www.zumu.com