| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern Bayshore Regional Dredged Material Management Plan for Raritan and Sandy Hook Bays in Monmouth County, New Jersey Project Name
Northern Bayshore Regional Dredged Material Management Plan for Raritan and
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Municipality |
Project Location |
Activity |
Quantity |
Destination |
Completed |
|
|
Monmouth County-Ferry |
Dredging |
9,900 |
|
1/14/1999 |
|
|
Captain's Cove |
Dredging |
350 |
Bayviewcon |
2/17/1999 |
|
|
Municipal |
Dredging |
11,800 |
Adj. CDF |
2/15/2000 |
|
|
Eugene Shute |
Dredging |
332 |
Onsite |
6/27/2000 |
|
|
Captain's Cove |
Dredging |
350 |
Onsite |
3/1/2001 |
|
|
Wagner's |
Dredge |
35 |
Onsite |
4/26/2001 |
|
Keansburg |
NJDEP BCE - Waackaak/Thorns |
Dredging |
29,100 |
Upland CDF |
12/18/2001 |
|
|
USCG |
Dredge/Bkwater |
1,900 |
Beach |
5/20/2002 |
|
Matawan |
Matawan Creek |
DredgeScience |
180 |
Matawan Creek |
5/29/2002 |
|
|
Naval Weapons Station Earle |
Dredging |
258,400 |
HARS |
8/30/2002 |
|
Keyport Boro |
Aero Marine Terminal |
Dredging |
6,000 |
Bk22 Lt20 |
9/4/2002 |
|
Keyport Boro |
Hans Pederson Boat Yard |
Dredging |
6,000 |
CDF |
9/4/2002 |
|
|
Lentze Marina, Inc. |
Dredging |
4,000 |
NJDEP CDF |
12/12/2002 |
|
|
Captain's Cove |
Dredging |
2,540 |
NJDEP CDF |
12/17/2002 |
|
|
|
Dredging |
2,500 |
|
7/3/2003 |
|
Keyport Boro |
|
Dredging |
15,000 |
Onsite CDF |
10/21/2003 |
|
Union/Keansburg (1300) |
NJDEP-Jetty Reconstruction |
Dredging |
30,000 |
Beach |
12/23/2003 |
|
|
|
Dredging |
unknown |
|
2/24/2004 |
|
|
Municipal |
Dredging |
20,000 |
Onsite CDF |
12/16/2004 |
|
|
Comptons Creek |
Dredging |
42,727 |
N61 |
3/14/2005 |
|
|
Naval Weapons Station Earle |
Pr. Rehab/Dredging |
540,000 |
ENCAP/FDP/HARS |
3/31/2005 |
|
|
Naval Weapons Station Earle |
Dredging |
521,000 |
Virginia Site/HARS |
6/17/2005 |
|
|
Municipal |
Dredging |
4,000 |
Onsite CDF |
12/22/2005 |
|
|
|
Dredging |
4,000 |
|
open |
|
Total (cubic yards) |
|
|
1,510,114 |
|
(1999 - 2005) |
Other General Information
At this time, Bayshore communities are in the process of developing a regional smart-growth strategic plan. The project is sponsored by the Monmouth County Planning Board and the New Jersey Office of Smart Growth. The Bayshore Regional Strategic Plan is a collaborative effort involving nine northern
The Monmouth County Bayshore Region is characterized by traditional downtowns, dense residential neighborhoods, rich maritime history, and the natural beauty of the
The Region’s key assets are pedestrian-friendly seaside villages, miles of sandy beaches, and proximity to the populated metropolitan areas of
The Bayshore Regional Strategic Plan will help revitalize and/or redevelop cities and towns, promote economic growth, preserve natural features and open space, encourage inter-municipal coordination and cooperation, and preserve and enhance quality of life.
The DMMP will be formulated with the guidance and consensus of an established Regional Collaborative consisting of the County and the region’s nine municipalities as well as other involved stakeholders having an interest in the preservation, growth and redevelopment of the Bayshore. Representatives from State agencies including the NJ Department of Transportation, NJ Department of Environmental Protection and the NJ Office of Smart Growth will be asked to participate in the Collaborative. The open planning process to be undertaken will allow stakeholder participation through regular meetings and strongly encourage public participation.
The proposed collaborative will provide a forum and opportunity for issues related to the DMMP to be discussed and resolved. Planning and decision-making associated with the DMMP can be incorporated into the larger Bayshore Smart Growth Development process. Integrating the DMMP into the economic vitality of the region will ensure its successful implementation success.
Proposal Description & Objectives
The goal of the proposed project is to produce a long-term regional dredged material management plan (DMMP) for the Bayshore region of
The Bayshore DMMP will serve as a model for other areas interested in developing a regional DMMP. Coastal communities throughout
In brief, $20,000 is being requested to create a regional DMMP. The proposed project will provide local officials with a comprehensive plan that identifies the highest and best use of material in their communities. Project partners will develop a regional plan that involves inter-town cooperation to:
Project Goals and Objectives
The project goal is to create a community forum by which user groups and stakeholders can participate in the development of the Dredged Material Management Plan. This will accomplish the following goals.
Goal #1: Determine extent of dredging needs along the Bayshore
Goal #2: Identify and explore the capabilities and opportunities for dredged material management in the Bayshore region.
Goal #3: Educate marina managers, municipal officials and the general public on dredged material and management.
Goal #4: Engage user-groups and the community in developing the Dredged Material Management Plan
Goal #5: Develop a Dredged Material Management Plan for the
Development of the Bayshore DMMP will follow a systematic process of data collection and strategy development. The steps necessary for developing a comprehensive management plan are listed below. In fact, some of this work has already begun by project partners such as the data collection of historical dredging along the Bayshore.
1) Determine the scope of the maintenance dredging needs in the region by:
a) Providing a detailed analysis of the volume of current maintenance dredging needs (local, state, and federal),
b) Quantifying the siltation rate of material to determine dredging needed to meet the substantiated volume based on a ten-year cycle,
c) Considering plans to reduce the volume of material that needs to be dredged by using naturally deep areas in a harbor (or estuary), and
d) Controlling sources of sediment in the watershed that fills in harbors and channels (e.g., soil erosion prevention techniques).
2) Discuss acceptable alternatives for dredged material management that are based on criteria developed by the community, and comply with local, state, and federal laws and regulations. Identify any regulatory constraints that limit dredged material management options.
3) Gather existing information about material to be dredged to determine general characteristics so that potential uses or limitations of the material can be identified.
4) Compile federal, state, and local laws and regulations to be included in a reference guide.
1) Identify a list of sites that meet NJDEP site selection criteria for beach replenishment, dewatering, and beneficial use and identify potential sites that support the annual dredging needs as well as watershed and community requirements.
a) Research and identify environmentally sound alternatives based on differing sediment characteristics and annual dredging needs and provide options for beneficial use of dredged materials. For example:
·
· For beach replenishment, life expectancy of sand on beach should be considered;
· Silt/mud can be beneficially used as topsoil, road bed material, landfill cover, or other such uses, but first requires a site for desalinating and dewatering; and
· Reducing sources of sediments will be necessary to minimize dredging needs.
At this stage, a needs assessment, a characterization and differentiation of the types of dredged material (which will accurately determine the annual volume of material that requires further treatment, such as dewatering), and a general list of alternatives will have been achieved.
1) Identify methods of dredging, as well as water and land transportation methods for the dredged material.
a) Efforts should be made to minimize dewatering needs, such as through particular dredging techniques or dewatering technologies that will minimize the volume of material to be managed.
b) Require environmental dredging techniques that are less disruptive to the sediments and that minimize re-suspension and release of contaminants in the waterway.
2) Develop an executive summary document for marina managers, municipal officials, and the general public that provides basic information about dredging operation and maintenance requirements. Summaries will include key information about construction, operations, and closure requirements for dredged material management facilities. References will be compiled to identify where additional resources can be found.
The following requirements should be implemented throughout the planning process.
Statement of Need
Population and boating interest continue to swell in
The project is not a duplication of services, as a DMMP does not exist for the Bayshore communities.
This project should be selected above all others because boating opportunities could see significant declines in the future.
Principal project partners include the
The municipalities in the Bayshore region and county agencies fully support the development of a regional DMMP and determine it necessary for the maintenance and enhancement of water recreation activities for which their communities are dependent. The Monmouth County Park System, the Borough of Atlantic Highlands,
A number of organizations have continually demonstrated support for the DMMP by participating in grant proposal development meetings. Representatives include the Atlantic Highlands Harbor Commission, Keyport Yacht Club, Pederson’s Marina, NJDEP – Coastal Engineering, Naval Weapons Station Earle, Monmouth County Park System, Monmouth County Planning Board, Atlantic Highlands Environmental Commission, Middletown Environmental Commission, Keyport Council and Commission Members, NJ Marine Sciences Consortium, and the Monmouth County Mosquito Extermination Commission.